#26

Friday Night.

May 17, 1845.

My friend is not ‘mistrustful’ of me, no, because she don’t fear I shall make mainprize of the stray cloaks and umbrellas down-stairs, or turn an article for Colburn’s on her sayings and doings up-stairs,  – – but spite of that, she does mistrust  . . . so mistrust my common sense,  – – nay, uncommon and dramatic-poet’s sense, if I am put on asserting it!  – – all which pieces of mistrust I could detect, and catch struggling, and pin to death in a moment, and put a label in, with name, genus and species, just like a horrible entomologist; only I won’t, because the first visit of the Northwind will carry the whole tribe into the Red Sea  – – and those horns and tails and scalewings are best forgotten altogether. Continue reading “#26”

#25

Thursday.

May 16, 1845.

But how ‘mistrustfulness’? And how ‘that way?’ What have I said or done, I, who am not apt to be mistrustful of anybody and should be a miraculous monster if I began with you! What can I have said, I say to myself again and again. Continue reading “#25”

#24

Tuesday Morning.

May 13, 1845.

Did I thank you with any effect in the lines I sent yesterday, dear Miss Barrett? I know I felt most thankful, and, of course, began reasoning myself into the impropriety of allowing a ‘more’ or a ‘most’ in feelings of that sort towards you. I am thankful for you, all about you  – – as, do you not know?

Thank you, from my soul. Continue reading “#24”

#23

Monday.

May 12, 1845.

My dear, own friend, I am quite well now, or next to it  – – but this is how it was,  – – I have gone out a great deal of late, and my head took to ringing such a literal alarum that I wondered what was to come of it; and at last, a few evenings ago, as I was dressing for a dinner somewhere, I got really bad of a sudden, and kept at home to my friend’s heartrending disappointment. Continue reading “#23”

#22

Sunday — in the last hour of it.

May 12, 1845.

May I ask how the head is? just under the bag? Mr. Kenyon was here to-day and told me such bad news that I cannot sleep to-night (although I did think once of doing it) without asking such a question as this, dear Mr. Browning. Continue reading “#22”

#21

Monday — and Tuesday.

May 6, 1845.

So when wise people happen to be ill, they sit up till six o’clock in the morning and get up again at nine? Do tell me how Lurias can ever be made out of such ungodly imprudences. If the wind blows east or west, where can any remedy be, while such evil deeds are being committed? And what is to be the end of it? And what is the reasonableness of it in the meantime, when we all know that thinking, dreaming, creating people like yourself, have two lives to bear instead of one, and therefore ought to sleep more than others,  . . . throwing over and buckling in that fold of death, to stroke the life-purple smoother. You have to live your own personal life, and also Luria’s life — and therefore you should sleep for both. Continue reading “#21”

#20

Saturday Morning.
May 3, 1845.

Now shall you see what you shall see  – – here shall be ‘sound speech not to be reproved,’  – – for this morning you are to know that the soul of me has it all her own way, dear Miss Barrett, this green cool nine-in-the-morning time for my chestnut tree over there, and for me who only coaxed my good-natured  – – (really)  – – body up, after its three-hours’ night-rest on condition it should lounge, or creep about, incognito and without consequences  – – and so it shall, all but my right-hand which is half-spirit and ‘cuts’ its poor relation, and passes itself off for somebody (that is, some soul) and is doubly active and ready on such occasions  – – Now I shall tell you all about it, first what last letter meant, and then more. You are to know, then that for some reason, that looked like an instinct, I thought I ought not to send shaft on shaft, letter-plague on letter, with such an uninterrupted clanging  . . . that I ought to wait, say a week at least having killed all your mules for you, before I shot down your dogs  – – but not being exactly Phoibos Apollon, you are to know further that when I did think I might go modestly on,  . . . ωμοι, let me get out of this slough of a simile, never mind with what dislocation of ancles! Plainly, from waiting and turning my eyes away (not from you, but from you in your special capacity of being written-to, not spoken-to) when I turned again you had grown formidable somehow  – – though that’s not the word,  – – nor are you the person, either,  – – it was my fortune, my privilege of being your friend this one way, that it seemed a shame for me to make no better use of than taking it up with talk about books and I don’t know what. Write what I will, you would read for once, I think  – – well, then,  – – what I shall write shall be  – – something on this book, and the other book, and my own books, and Mary Hewitt’s books, and at the end of it  – – good bye, and I hope here is a quarter of an hour rationally spent. So the thought of what I should find in my heart to say, and the contrast with what I suppose I ought to say  . . . all these things are against me. But this is very foolish, all the same, I need not be told  – – and is part and parcel of an older  – – indeed primitive body of mine, which I shall never wholly get rid of, of desiring to do nothing when I cannot do all; seeing nothing, getting, enjoying nothing, where there is no seeing and getting and enjoying wholly  – – and in this case, moreover, you are you, and know something about me, if not much, and have read Bos on the art of supplying Ellipses, and (after, particularly, I have confessed all this, why and how it has been) you will subaudire when I pull out my Mediæval-Gothic-Architectural-Manuscript (so it was, I remember now,) and instruct you about corbeils and ogives  . . . though, after all, it was none of Vivian’s doing, that,  – – all the uncle kind or man’s, which I never professed to be. Now you see how I came to say some nonsense (I very vaguely think what) about Dante  – – some desperate splash I know I made for the beginning of my picture, as when a painter at his wits’ end and hunger’s beginning says ‘Here shall the figure’s hand be’  – – and spots that down, meaning to reach it naturally from the other end of his canvas,  – – and leaving off tired, there you see the spectral disjoined thing, and nothing between it and rationality. I intended to shade down and soften off and put in and leave out, and, before I had done, bring Italian Poets round to their old place again in my heart, giving new praise if I took old,  – – anyhow Dante is out of it all, as who knows but I, with all of him in my head and heart? But they do fret one, those tantalizing creatures, of fine passionate class, with such capabilities, and such a facility of being made pure mind of. And the special instance that vexed me, was that a man of sands and dog-roses and white rock and green sea-water just under, should come to Italy where my heart lives, and discover the sights and sounds  . . . certainly discover them. And so do all Northern writers; for take up handfuls of sonetti, rime, poemetti, doings of those who never did anything else,  – – and try and make out, for yourself, what  . . . say, what flowers they tread on, or trees they walk under,  – – as you might bid them, those tree and flower loving creatures, pick out of our North poetry a notion of what our daisies and harebells and furze bushes and brambles are  – – ‘Odorosi fioretti, rose porporine, bianchissimi gigli.’ And which of you eternal triflers was it called yourself ‘Shelley’ and so told me years ago that in the mountains it was a feast

When one should find those globes of deep red gold  – –
Which in the woods the strawberry-tree doth bear,
Suspended in their emerald atmosphere.

so that when my Uncle walked into a sorb-tree, not to tumble sheer over Monte Calvano, and I felt the fruit against my face, the little ragged bare-legged guide fairly laughed at my knowing them so well  – – ‘Niursi  – – sorbi!’ No, no,  – – does not all Naples-bay and half Sicily, shore and inland, come flocking once a year to the Piedigrotta fête only to see the blessed King’s Volanti, or livery servants all in their best; as though heaven opened; and would not I engage to bring the whole of the Piano (of Sorrento) in likeness to a red velvet dressing gown properly spangled over, before the priest that held it out on a pole had even begun his story of how Noah’s son Shem, the founder of Sorrento, threw it off to swim thither, as the world knows he did? Oh, it makes one’s soul angry, so enough of it. But never enough of telling you  – – bring all your sympathies, come with loosest sleeves and longest lace-lappets, and you and yours shall find ‘elbow room,’ oh, shall you not! For never did man, woman or child, Greek, Hebrew, or as Danish as our friend, like a thing, not to say love it, but I liked and loved it, one liking neutralizing the rebellious stir of its fellow, so that I don’t go about now wanting the fixed stars before my time; this world has not escaped me, thank God; and  – – what other people say is the best of it, may not escape me after all, though until so very lately I made up my mind to do without it;  – – perhaps, on that account, and to make fair amends to other people, who, I have no right to say, complain without cause. I have been surprised, rather, with something not unlike illness of late  – – I have had a constant pain in the head for these two months, which only very rough exercise gets rid of, and which stops my ‘Luria’ and much besides. I thought I never could be unwell. Just now all of it is gone, thanks to polking all night and walking home by broad daylight to the surprise of the thrushes in the bush here. And do you know I said ‘this must go, cannot mean to stay, so I will not tell Miss Barrett why this and this is not done,’  – – but I mean to tell you all, or more of the truth, because you call me ‘flatterer,’ so that my eyes widened again! I, and in what? And of whom, pray? not of you, at all events,  – – of whom then? Do tell me, because I want to stand with you  – – and am quite in earnest there. And ‘The Flight of the Duchess,’ to leave nothing out, is only the beginning of a story written some time ago, and given to poor Hood in his emergency at a day’s notice,  – – the true stuff and story is all to come, the ‘Flight,’ and what you allude to is the mere introduction  – – but the Magazine has passed into other hands and I must put the rest in some ‘Bell’ or other  – – it is one of my Dramatic Romances. So is a certain ‘Saul’ I should like to show you one day  – – an ominous liking  – – for nobody ever sees what I do till it is printed. But as you do know the printed little part of me, I should not be sorry if, in justice, you knew all I have really done,  – – written in the portfolio there,  – – though that would be far enough from this me, that wishes to you now. I should like to write something in concert with you, how I would try!

I have read your letter through again. Does this clear up all the difficulty, and do you see that I never dreamed of ‘reproaching you for dealing out one sort of cards to me and everybody else’  – – but that  . . . why, ‘that‘ which I have, I hope, said, so need not resay. I will tell you  – – Sydney Smith laughs somewhere at some Methodist or other whose wont was, on meeting an acquaintance in the street, to open at once on him with some enquiry after the state of his soul  – – Sydney knows better now, and sees that one might quite as wisely ask such questions as the price of Illinois stock or condition of glebe-land,  – – and I could say such  – – ‘could,’  – – the plague of it! So no more at present from your loving . . .. Or, let me tell you I am going to see Mr. Kenyon on the 12th inst.  – – that you do not tell me how you are, and that yet if you do not continue to improve in health  . . . I shall not see you  – – not  – – not  – – not  – – what ‘knots’ to untie! Surely the wind that sets my chestnut-tree dancing, all its baby-cone-blossoms, green now, rocking like fairy castles on a hill in an earthquake,  – – that is South West, surely! God bless you, and me in that  – – and do write to me soon, and tell me who was the ‘flatterer,’ and how he never was

Yours         

R.B.

#19

Thursday.
May 2, 1845.

People say of you and of me, dear Mr. Browning, that we love the darkness and use a sphinxine idiom in our talk; and really you do talk a little like a sphinx in your argument drawn from ‘Vivian Grey.’ Once I sate up all night to read ‘Vivian Grey’; but I never drew such an argument from him. Not that I give it up (nor you up) for a mere mystery. Nor that I can ‘see what you have got in you,’ from a mere guess. But just observe! If I ask questions about novels, is it not because I want to know how much elbow-room there may be for our sympathies  . . . and whether there is room for my loose sleeves, and the lace lappets, as well as for my elbows; and because I want to see you by the refracted lights as well as by the direct ones; and because I am willing for you to know me from the beginning, with all my weaknesses and foolishnesses,  . . . as they are accounted by people who say to me ‘no one would ever think, without knowing you, that you were so and so.’ Now if I send all my idle questions to Colburn’s Magazine, with other Gothic literature, and take to standing up in a perpendicular personality like the angel on the schoolman’s needle, in my letters to come, without further leaning to the left or the right — why the end would be that you would take to ‘running after the butterflies,’ for change of air and exercise. And then  . . . oh  . . . then, my ‘small neatly written manuscripts’ might fall back into my desk . . .! (Not a ‘full stop’!.)

Indeed  . . . I do assure you  . . . I never for a moment thought of ‘making conversation’ about the ‘Improvisatore’ or novels in general, when I wrote what I did to you. I might, to other persons  . . . perhaps. Certainly not to you. I was not dealing round from one pack of cards to you and to others. That’s what you meant to reproach me for you know, — and of that, I am not guilty at all. I never could think of ‘making conversation’ in a letter to you — never. Women are said to partake of the nature of children — and my brothers call me ‘absurdly childish’ sometimes: and I am capable of being childishly ‘in earnest’ about novels, and straws, and such ‘puppydogs’ tails’ as my Flush’s! Also I write more letters than you do,  . . . I write in fact almost as you pay visits,  . . . and one has to ‘make conversation’ in turn, of course. But — give me something to vow by — whatever you meant in the ‘Vivian Grey’ argument, you were wrong in it! and you never can be much more wrong — which is a comfortable reflection.

Yet you leap very high at Dante’s crown — or you do not leap,  . . . you simply extend your hand to it, and make a rustling among the laurel leaves, which is somewhat prophane. Dante’s poetry only materials for the northern rhymers! I must think of that  . . . if you please  . . . before I agree with you. Dante’s poetry seems to come down in hail, rather than in rain — but count me the drops congealed in one hailstone! Oh! the ‘Flight of the Duchess’ — do let us hear more of her! Are you (I wonder)  . . . not a ‘self-flatterer,’  . . . but  . . . a flatterer.

Ever yours,  

E.B.B.