#145

Wednesday.

November 6, 1845.

I had your note last night, and am waiting for the book to-day; a true living breathing book, let the writer say of it what he will. Also when it comes it won’t certainly come ‘sine te.’ Which is my comfort.

And now — not to make any more fuss about a matter of simple restitution — may I have my letter back? . . . I mean the letter which if you did not destroy  . . . did not punish for its sins long and long ago  . . . belongs to me — which, if destroyed, I must lose for my sins,  . . . but, if undestroyed, which I may have back; may I not? is it not my own? must I not? — that letter I was made to return and now turn to ask for again in further expiation. Now do I ask humbly enough? And send it at once, if undestroyed — do not wait till Saturday.

I have considered about Mr. Kenyon and it seems best, in the event of a question or of a remark equivalent to a question, to confess to the visits ‘generally once a week’  . . . because he may hear, one, two, three different ways,  . . . not to say the other reasons and Chaucer’s charge against ‘doubleness.’ I fear  . . . I fear that he (not Chaucer) will wonder a little — and he has looked at me with scanning spectacles already and talked of its being a mystery to him how you made your way here; and I, who though I can bespeak self-command, have no sort of presence of mind (not so much as one would use to play at Jack straws) did not help the case at all. Well — it cannot be helped. Did I ever tell you what he said of you once — ‘that you deserved to be a poet — being one in your heart and life:’ he said that of you to me, and I thought it a noble encomium and deserving its application.

For the rest  . . . yes: you know I do — God knows I do. Whatever I can feel is for you — and perhaps it is not less, for not being simmered away in too much sunshine as with women accounted happier. I am happy besides now — happy enough to die now.

May God bless you, dear — dearest —

Ever I am yours —

The book does not come — so I shall not wait. Mr. Kenyon came instead, and comes again on Friday he says, and Saturday seems to be clear still.

 

#143

November 1, 1845.

All to-day, Friday, Miss Mitford has been here! She came at two and went away at seven — and I feel as if I had been making a five-hour speech on the corn laws in Harriet Martineau’s parliament;  . . . so tired I am. Not that dear Miss Mitford did not talk both for me and herself,  . . . for that, of course she did. But I was forced to answer once every ten minutes at least — Continue reading “#143”

#141

I write in haste, not to lose time about the proof. You will see on the papers here my doubtfulnesses such as they are — but silence swallows up the admirations  . . . and there is no time. ‘Theocrite’ overtakes that wish of mine which ran on so fast — Continue reading “#141”

#138

Friday.

October 25, 1845.

I wrote briefly yesterday not to make my letter longer by keeping it; and a few last words which belong to it by right, must follow after it  . . . must — for I want to say that you need not indeed talk to me about squares being not round, and of you being not ‘selfish’! You know it is foolish to talk such superfluities, and not a compliment. Continue reading “#138”

#137

October 24, 1845.

‘And be forgiven‘  . . . yes! and be thanked besides — if I knew how to thank you worthily and as I feel  . . . only that I do not know it, and cannot say it. And it was not indeed ‘doubt’ of you — oh no — that made me write as I did write; it was rather because I felt you to be surely noblest,  . . . and therefore fitly dearest,  . . . that it seemed to me detestable and intolerable to leave you on this road where the mud must splash up against you, and never cry ‘gare.’ Yet I was quite enough unhappy yesterday, and before yesterday  . . . I will confess to-day,  . . . to be too gratefully glad to ‘let you be’  . . . to ‘let you have your way’ — you who overcome always! Always, but where you tell me not to think of you so and so! — as if I could help thinking of you so, and as if I should not take the liberty of persisting to think of you just so. ‘Let me be’ — Let me have my way.’ I am unworthy of you perhaps in everything except one thing — and that, you cannot guess. May God bless you —

Ever I am yours.

The proof does not come!

 

#132

Friday.

October 17, 1845.

Do tell me what you mean precisely by your ‘Bells and Pomegranates’ title. I have always understood it to refer to the Hebraic priestly garment — Continue reading “#132”

#131

Wednesday.

October 16, 1845.

Your letter which should have reached me in the morning of yesterday, I did not receive until nearly midnight — partly through the eccentricity of our new postman whose good pleasure it is to make use of the letter-box without knocking; and partly from the confusion in the house, of illness in different ways  . . . the very servants being ill,  . . . one of them breaking a blood-vessel — for there is no new case of fever;  . . . and for dear Occy, he grows better slowly day by day. And just so late last night, five letters were found in the letter-box, and mine  . . . yours  . . . among them — which accounts for my beginning to answer it only now.

What am I to say but this  . . . that I know what you are  . . . and that I know also what you are to me, — and that I should accept that knowledge as more than sufficient recompense for worse vexations than these late ones. Therefore let no more be said of them: and no more need be said, even if they were not likely to prove their own end good, as I believe with you. You may be quite sure that I shall be well this winter, if in any way it should be possible, and that I will not be beaten down, if the will can do anything. I admire how, if all had happened so but a year ago, (yet it could not have happened quite so!), I should certainly have been beaten down — and how it is different now,  . . . and how it is only gratitude to you, to say that it is different now. My cage is not worse but better since you brought the green groundsel to it — and to dash oneself against the wires of it will not open the door. We shall see  . . . and God will oversee. And in the meantime you will not talk of extravagances; and then nobody need hold up the hand — because, as I said and say, I am yours, your own — only not to hurt you. So now let us talk of the first of November and of the poems which are to come out then, and of the poems which are to come after then — and of the new avatar of ‘Sordello,’ for instance, which you taught me to look for. And let us both be busy and cheerful — and you will come and see me throughout the winter,  . . . if you do not decide rather on going abroad, which may be better  . . . better for your health’s sake? — in which case I shall have your letters.

And here is another  . . . just arrived. How I thank you. Think of the Times! Still it was very well of them to recognise your principality. Oh yes — do let me see the proof — I understand too about the ‘making and spoiling.’

Almost you forced me to smile by thinking it worth while to say that you are ‘not selfish.’ Did Sir Percival say so to Sir Gawaine across the Round Table, in those times of chivalry to which you belong by the soul? Certainly you are not selfish! May God bless you.

Ever your

E.B.B.

The fever may last, they say, for a week longer, or even a fortnight — but it decreases. Yet he is hot still, and very weak.

To to-morrow!

 

#129

Tuesday,

October 15, 1845.

Will this note reach you at the ‘fatal hour’  . . . or sooner? At any rate it is forced to ask you to take Thursday for Wednesday, inasmuch as Mr. Kenyon in his exceeding kindness has put off his journey just for me, he says, because he saw me depressed about the decision, and wished to come and see me again to-morrow and talk the spirits up, I suppose. It is all so kind and good, that I cannot find a voice to grumble about the obligation it brings of writing thus. And then, if you suffer from cold and influenza, it will be better for you not to come for another day,  . . . I think that, for comfort. Shall I hear how you are to-night, I wonder? Dear Occy ‘turned the corner,’ the physician said, yesterday evening, and, although a little fluctuating to-day, remains on the whole considerably better. They were just in time to keep the fever from turning to typhus.

How fast you print your book, for it is to be out on the first of November! Why it comes out suddenly like the sun. Mr. Kenyon asked me if I had seen anything you were going to print; and when I mentioned the second part of the ‘Duchess’ and described how your perfect rhymes, perfectly new, and all clashing together as by natural attraction, had put me at once to shame and admiration, he began to praise the first part of the same poem (which I had heard him do before, by the way) and extolled it as one of your most striking productions.

And so until Thursday! May God bless you —

and as the heart goes, ever yours.

I am glad for Tennyson, and glad for Keats. It is well to be able to be glad about something — is is it not? about something out of ourselves. And (in myself) I shall be most glad, if I have a letter to-night. Shall I?

 

#127

Saturday.

October 14, 1845.

It was the merest foolishness in me to write about fevers and the rest as I did to-day, just as if it could do any good, all the wringing of hands in the world. And there is no typhus yet  . . . and no danger of any sort I hope and trust! — and how weak it is that habit of spreading the cloud which is in you all around you, how weak and selfish  . . . and unlike what you would do  . . . just as you are unlike Mr. Kenyon. And you are unlike him — and you were right on Thursday when you said so, and I was wrong in setting up a phrase on the other side  . . . only what I said came by an instinct because you seemed to be giving him all the sunshine to use and carry, which should not be after all. But you are unlike him and must be  . . . seeing that the producers must differ from the ‘nati consumere fruges’ in the intellectual as in the material. You create and he enjoys, and the work makes you pale and the pleasure makes him ruddy, and it is so of a necessity. So differs the man of genius from the man of letters — and then dear Mr. Kenyon is not even a man of letters in a full sense  . . . he is rather a Sybarite of letters. Do you think he ever knew what mental labour is? I fancy not. Not more than he has known what mental inspiration is! And not more than he has known what the strife of the heart is  . . . with all his tenderness and sensibility. He seems to me to evade pain, and where he suffers at all to do so rather negatively than positively  . . . if you understand what I mean by that  . . . rather by a want than by a blow: the secret of all being that he has a certain latitudinarianism (not indifferentism) in his life and affections, and has no capacity for concentration and intensity. Partly by temperament and partly by philosophy he contrives to keep the sunny side of the street — though never inclined to forget the blind man at the corner. Ah, dear Mr. Kenyon: he is magnanimous in toleration, and excellent in sympathy — and he has the love of beauty and the reverence of genius — but the faculty of worship he has not: he will not worship aright either your heroes or your gods  . . . and while you do it he only ‘tolerates’ the act in you. Once he said  . . . not to me  . . . but I heard of it: ‘What, if genius should be nothing but scrofula?’ and he doubts (I very much fear) whether the world is not governed by a throw of those very same ‘loaded dice,’ and no otherwise. Yet he reveres genius in the acting of it, and recognizes a God in creation — only it is but ‘so far,’ and not farther. At least I think not — and I have a right to think what I please of him, holding him as I do, in such true affection. One of the kindest and most indulgent of human beings has he been to me, and I am happy to be grateful to him.

Sunday. — The Duke of Palmella takes the whole vessel for the 20th and therefore if I go it must be on the 17th. Therefore (besides) as George must be on sessions to-morrow, he will settle the question with Papa to-night. In the meantime our poor Occy is not much better, though a little, and is ordered leeches on his head, and is confined to his bed and attended by physician and surgeon. It is not decided typhus, but they will not answer for its not being infectious; and although he is quite at the top of the house, two stories above me, I shall not like you to come indeed. And then there will be only room for a farewell, and I who am a coward shrink from the saying of it. No — not being able to see you to-morrow, (Mr. Kenyon is to be here to-morrow, he says) let us agree to throw away Wednesday. I will write,  . . . you will write perhaps — and above all things you will promise to write by the ‘Star’ on Monday, that the captain may give me your letter at Gibraltar. You promise? But I shall hear from you before then, and oftener than once, and you will acquiesce about Wednesday and grant at once that there can be no gain, no good, in that miserable good-bye-ing. I do not want the pain of it to remember you by — I shall remember very well without it, be sure. Still it shall be as you like — as you shall chose — and if you are disappointed about Wednesday (if it is not vain in me to talk of disappointments) why do with Wednesday as you think best  . . . always understanding that there’s no risk of infection.

Monday. — All this I had written yesterday — and to-day it all is worse than vain. Do not be angry with me — do not think it my fault — but I do not go to Italy  . . . it has ended as I feared. What passed between George and Papa there is no need of telling: only the latter said that I ‘might go if I pleased, but that going it would be under his heaviest displeasure.’ George, in great indignation, pressed the question fully: but all was vain  . . . and I am left in this position  . . . to go, if I please, with his displeasure over me, (which after what you have said and after what Mr. Kenyon has said, and after what my own conscience and deepest moral convictions say aloud, I would unhesitatingly do at this hour!) and necessarily run the risk of exposing my sister and brother to that same displeasure  . . . from which risk I shrink and fall back and feel that to incur it, is impossible. Dear Mr. Kenyon has been here and we have been talking — and he sees what I see  . . . that I am justified in going myself, but not in bringing others into difficulty. The very kindness and goodness with which they desire me (both my sisters) ‘not to think of them,’ naturally makes me think more of them. And so, tell me that I am not wrong in taking up my chain again and acquiescing in this hard necessity. The bitterest ‘fact’ of all is, that I had believed Papa to have loved me more than he obviously does: but I never regret knowledge  . . . I mean I never would unknow anything  . . . even were it the taste of the apples by the Dead sea — and this must be accepted like the rest. In the meantime your letter comes — and if I could seem to be very unhappy after reading it  . . . why it would be ‘all pretence’ on my part, believe me. Can you care for me so much  . . . you? Then that is light enough to account for all the shadows, and to make them almost unregarded — the shadows of the life behind. Moreover dear Occy is somewhat better — with a pulse only at ninety: and the doctors declare that visitors may come to the house without any manner of danger. Or I should not trust to your theories — no, indeed: it was not that I expected you to be afraid, but that I was afraid — and if I am not ashamed for that, why at least I am, for being lâche about Wednesday, when you thought of hurrying back from Paris only for it! You could think that! — You can care for me so much! — (I come to it again!) When I hold some words to my eyes  . . . such as these in this letter  . . . I can see nothing beyond them  . . . no evil, no want. There is no evil and no want. Am I wrong in the decision about Italy? Could I do otherwise? I had courage and to spare — but the question, you see, did not regard myself wholly. For the rest, the ‘unforbidden country’ lies within these four walls. Madeira was proposed in vain — and any part of England would be as objectionable as Italy, and not more advantageous to me than Wimpole Street. To take courage and be cheerful, as you say, is left as an alternative — and (the winter may be mild!) to fall into the hands of God rather than of man: and I shall be here for your November, remember.

And now that you are not well, will you take care? and not come on Wednesday unless you are better? and never again bring me wet flowers, which probably did all the harm on Thursday? I was afraid for you then, though I said nothing. May God bless you.

Ever yours I am — your own.

Ninety is not a high pulse  . . . for a fever of this kind — is it? and the heat diminishes, and his spirits are better — and we are all much easier  . . . have been both to-day and yesterday indeed.