#130

October 15, 1845.

Thanks, my dearest, for the good news  – – of the fever’s abatement  – – it is good, too, that you write cheerfully, on the whole: what is it to me that you write is of me  . . . I shall never say that! Mr. Kenyon is all kindness, and one gets to take it as not so purely natural a thing, the showing kindness to those it concerns, and belongs to,  – – well! On Thursday, then,  – – to-morrow! Did you not get a note of mine, a hurried note, which was meant for yesterday-afternoon’s delivery?

Mr. Forster came yesterday and was very profuse of graciosities: he may have, or must have meant well, so we will go on again with the friendship, as the snail repairs his battered shell.

My poems went duly to press on Monday night  – – there is not much correctable in them,  – – you make, or you spoil, one of these things; that is, I do. I have adopted all your emendations, and thrown in lines and words, just a morning’s business; but one does not write plays so. You may like some of my smaller things, which stop interstices, better than what you have seen; I shall wonder to know. I am to receive a proof at the end of the week  – – will you help me and over-look it. (‘Yes’  – – she says  . . . my thanks I do not say!  – – )

While writing this, the Times catches my eye (it just came in) and something from the Lancet is extracted, a long article against quackery  – – and, as I say, this is the first and only sentence I read  – – ‘There is scarcely a peer of the realm who is not the patron of some quack pill or potion: and the literati too, are deeply tainted. We have heard of barbarians who threw quacks and their medicines into the sea: but here in England we have Browning, a prince of poets, touching the pitch which defiles and making Paracelsus the hero of a poem. Sir E.L. Bulwer writes puffs for the water doctors in a style worthy of imitation by the scribe that does the poetical for Moses and Son. Miss Martineau makes a finessing servant girl her physician-general: and Richard Howitt and the Lady aforesaid stand God-father and mother to the contemptible mesmeric vagaries of Spencer Hall.’  – – Even the sweet incense to me fails of its effect if Paracelsus is to figure on a level with Priessnitz, and ‘Jane’!

What weather, now at last! Think for yourself and for me  – – could you not go out on such days?

I am quite well now  – – cold, over and gone. Did I tell you my Uncle arrived from Paris on Monday, as they hoped he would  – – so my travel would have been to great purpose!

Bless my dearest  – – my own!

R.B.

 

#129

Tuesday,

October 15, 1845.

Will this note reach you at the ‘fatal hour’  . . . or sooner? At any rate it is forced to ask you to take Thursday for Wednesday, inasmuch as Mr. Kenyon in his exceeding kindness has put off his journey just for me, he says, because he saw me depressed about the decision, and wished to come and see me again to-morrow and talk the spirits up, I suppose. It is all so kind and good, that I cannot find a voice to grumble about the obligation it brings of writing thus. And then, if you suffer from cold and influenza, it will be better for you not to come for another day,  . . . I think that, for comfort. Shall I hear how you are to-night, I wonder? Dear Occy ‘turned the corner,’ the physician said, yesterday evening, and, although a little fluctuating to-day, remains on the whole considerably better. They were just in time to keep the fever from turning to typhus.

How fast you print your book, for it is to be out on the first of November! Why it comes out suddenly like the sun. Mr. Kenyon asked me if I had seen anything you were going to print; and when I mentioned the second part of the ‘Duchess’ and described how your perfect rhymes, perfectly new, and all clashing together as by natural attraction, had put me at once to shame and admiration, he began to praise the first part of the same poem (which I had heard him do before, by the way) and extolled it as one of your most striking productions.

And so until Thursday! May God bless you —

and as the heart goes, ever yours.

I am glad for Tennyson, and glad for Keats. It is well to be able to be glad about something — is is it not? about something out of ourselves. And (in myself) I shall be most glad, if I have a letter to-night. Shall I?