#282

[Postmark: March 25, 1846]

Wednesday.

You were right to bid me never again wish my poor flowers were ‘diamonds’ — you could not, I think, speak so to my heart of any diamonds. God knows my life is for you
to take just as you take flowers :— these last please you,
serve you best when plucked — and ‘my life’s rose’ . . if I
dared profane that expression I would say, you have but to
‘stoop’ for it. Foolish, as all words are.

You dwell on that notion of your being peculiarly isolated,
— of any kindness to you, in your present state, seeming
doubled and quadrupled — what do I, what could anyone
infer from that but, most obviously, that it was a very
fortunate thing for such kindness, and that the presumable
bestower of it got all his distinction from the fact that no
better . . however, I hate this and cannot go on. Dearest,
believe that under ordinary circumstances, with ordinary
people, all operates differently — the imaginary kindness-
bestower with his ideal methods of showing and proving his
love, — there would be the rival to fear !

Do not let us talk of this — you always beat me, beside,
turn my own illustrations into obscurations — as in the notable
case of the cards and stakes and risks — I suppose, (to save
my vanity!) that if I knew anything about cards, I might go
on, a step at least, with my argument. I once heard a dispute in the street between the proprietor of an oyster-stall
and one of his customers — who was in the wrong . . that
is, who used the clenching argument you shall hear presently,
I don’t remember ; but one brought the other to this pass —

‘Are there three shells to an oyster?’ — Just that ! If there
were not — he would clearly be found in the wrong, that was
all ! — ‘Why,’ . . began the other; and I regret I did not
catch the rest — there was such a clear possibility contained
in that ‘Why . . an oyster might have three shells !’

Note the adroitness, — (calm heroic silence of the act
rather than a merely attempted word,) the mastery with
which, taking up Ba’s implied challenge, I do furnish her
with both ‘ amusement and instruction ‘ — moreover I will
at Ba’s bidding amuse and instruct the world at large, and
make them know all to be known — for my purposes — about
‘ Bells and Pomegranates ‘ — yes, it will be better.

I said rather hastily that my head ‘ached’ yesterday :
that meant, only that it was more observable because, after
walking, it is usually well — and I had been walking. To-day
it is much better ; I sit reading ‘Cromwell,’ and the newspaper,
and presently I shall go out — all will be better now,
I hope — it shall not be my fault, at least, depend on that.
All my work (work !) — well, such as it is, it is done — and I
scarcely care how — I shall be prouder to begin one day—
(may it be soon! — ) with your hand in mine from the beginning — that
is a very different thing in its effect from the same
hand touching mine after I had begun, with no suspicion
such a chance could befall ! I repeat, both these things,
‘Luria’ and the other, are manque, failures — the life-incidents
ought to have been acted over again, experienced afresh ;
and I had no inclination nor ability. But one day, my siren !

Let me make haste and correct a stupid error. I spoke
to my father last night about that tragedy of the studs — I
was wholly out in the story — the sufferer was his uncle, and
the scene should have been laid on the Guinea coast. A propos
of errors — the copyright matter is most likely a case of copy-wrong
by reporters — I never heard of it before — to be sure, I
signed a petition of Miss Martineau’s superintending once on
a time — but long ago, ‘I, I, I’ — how, dear, all important ‘I’
takes care of himself, and issues bulletins, and corrects his
wise mistakes, and all this to . . just ‘one of his readers
of the average intelligence.’ Are you that, so much as that,
Ba ? I will tell you — if you do not write to me all about
vour dear, dearest self, I shall sink with shame at the recollection
of what this letter and its like prove to be — must
prove to be ! Dear love, tell me — that you walk and are in
good spirits, and I will try and write better. May God
bless my own beloved! — Ever her own

R.

I think, am all but sure, there is a Mrs. Hornblower something !

Just a minute to say your second note has come, and
that I do hate hate having to write, not kiss my answer on
your dearest mouth — kindest, dearest — to-morrow I will
try — and meantime — though Ba by the fire will not be cold
at heart, cold of heart, at least, and I will talk to her and
more than talk — My dearest, dearest one!

#281

Tuesday Evening.

March 25, 1846.

Ah; if I ‘do‘  . . . if I ‘should‘  . . . if I shall  . . . if I will  . . . if I must  . . . what can all the ‘ifs’ prove, but a most hypothetical state of the conscience? And in brief, I beg you to stand convinced of one thing, that whenever the ‘certain time’ comes for to ‘hate writing to me’ confessedly, ‘avowedly,’ (oh what words!) I shall not like it at all — not for all the explanations  . . . and the sights in gondola chairs, which the person seen is none the better for! The ειδωλον sits by the fire — the real Ba is cold at heart through wanting her letter. And that’s the doctrine to be preached now,  . . . is it? I ‘shrink,’ shrink from it. That’s your word! — and mine! Dearest, I began by half a jest and end by half-gravity, which is the fault of your doctrine and not of me I think. Yet it is ungrateful to be grave, when practically you are good and just about the letters, and generous too sometimes, and I could not bear the idea of obliging you to write to me, even once  . . . when . . .. Now do not fancy that I do not understand. I understand perfectly, on the contrary. Only do you try not to dislike writing when you write, or not to write when you dislike it  . . . that, I ask of you, dear dearest — and forgive me for all this over-writing and teazing and vexing which is foolish and womanish in the bad sense. It is a way of meeting,  . . . the meeting in letters,  . . . and next to receiving a letter from you, I like to write one to you  . . . and, so, revolt from thinking it lawful for you to dislike . . .. Well! the Goddess of Dulness herself couldn’t have written this better, anyway, nor more characteristically.

I will tell you how it is. You have spoilt me just as I have spoilt Flush. Flush looks at me sometimes with reproachful eyes ‘a fendre le coeur,’ because I refuse to give him my fur cuffs to tear to pieces. And as for myself, I confess to being more than half jealous of the ειδωλον in the gondola chair, who isn’t the real Ba after all, and yet is set up there to do away with the necessity ‘at certain times’ of writing to her. Which is worse than Flush. For Flush, though he began by shivering with rage and barking and howling and gnashing his teeth at the brown dog in the glass, has learnt by experience what that image means,  . . . and now contemplates it, serene in natural philosophy. Most excellent sense, all this is! — and dauntlessly ‘delivered!’

Your head aches, dearest. Mr. Moxon will have done his worst, however, presently, and then you will be a little better I do hope and trust — and the proofs, in the meanwhile, will do somewhat less harm than the manuscript. You will take heart again about ‘Luria’  . . . which I agree with you, is more diffuse  . . . that is, less close, than any of your works, not diffuse in any bad sense, but round, copious, and another proof of that wonderful variety of faculty which is so striking in you, and which signalizes itself both in the thought and in the medium of the thought. You will appreciate ‘Luria’ in time — or others will do it for you. It is a noble work under every aspect. Dear ‘Luria’! Do you remember how you told me of ‘Luria’ last year, in one of your early letters? Little I thought that ever, ever, I should feel so, while ‘Luria’ went to be printed! A long trail of thoughts, like the rack in the sky, follows his going. Can it be the same ‘Luria,’ I think, that ‘golden-hearted Luria,’ whom you talked of to me, when you complained of keeping ‘wild company,’ in the old dear letter? And I have learnt since, that ‘golden-hearted‘ is not a word for him only, or for him most. May God bless you, best and dearest! I am your own to live and to die —

Ba.

Say how you are. I shall be down-stairs to-morrow if it keeps warm.

Miss Thomson wants me to translate the Hector and Andromache scene from the ‘Iliad’ for her book; and I am going to try it.