#340

[Postmark: May 2, 1846]

No, my Ba, your letter came as it ought last night, — and
the promise it contained of another made me restless all the
morning — to no purpose, — nothing more comes— yet — for
there is a ‘ peradventure ‘ yet unwithdrawn. When I do not
hear from you, as now, I always fancy there was some
signal reason why I ought to have heard . . that ‘ to-morrow,’
I could better bear the not hearing . . though never, never
do yesterday’s letters slip by a hair’s breadth from the place in
my affection they once take, — they could not have been dis-
pensed with,— but the imaginary letter of to-morrow could,
by contrast with to-day’s exigencies . . till to-morrow really
comes and is found preferring such claims of its own — such
claims.

This letter I have got, and will try and love enough for
two . . I can do no harm by trying . . this I do not mean
to say that I expected. May I say ‘ in heart-playing,’ . . now,
Ba, it will be a fancy, which you can pounce on and poke
your humming-bird bill through, like a needle, in a very
‘ twinkling,’ and so shall my flower’s eye be ruined for ever,
and when it turns black and shrivels up as dead flowers do,
you can triumph and ask ‘ are these your best flowers, best
feelings for me ? ‘. But now, after this deprecation, you will
be generous and only hover above, using the diamond eye
rather than the needle-bill, — and I will go on and dare say
that I should like, for one half second, not to love you, and
then feel all the love lit up in a flame to the topmost height,
at the falling of such a letter on my heart. Don’t you know
that foolish boys sometimes play at hanging themselves—
suspend themselves by the neck actually for such a half second
as this of my fancying — that they may taste the luxury of catch-
ing back at existence, and being cut down again ? There is
a notable exemplification, a worthy simile ! It all comes,
I suppose, from the joy of being rid handsomely of my
dinners and in a fair way for Monday . . nothing between
but letters, — I shall continue to hope ! At sea it always
sounds pleasantly to hear . . after passing Cape This and
Isle the other, ‘ now, next land we make is— Italy, or England,
or Greece.’

Moxon told me Tennyson was still in Town. Switzerland ?
He is a fortnight going to wherever a Train takes
him — ‘for,’ says Moxon, ‘ he has to pack up, and is too late,
and next day ‘ . . I dare say he unaffectedly hates London
where this poco-curanteism would entail all manner of dis-
agreeabilities. If I caught rightly . . that is, now apply
rightly, a word or two I heard . . one striking celebrity at
Dickens’ Dinner was — Lord Chesterfield — literary, inasmuch
as a great ‘ maker up of books ‘ — for the Derby. Macready
may have been another personage — they, Tennyson and he,
may ‘ fadge,’ in Shakespearian phrase, if the writer of the
‘ Two Voices ‘ &c. considers Home’s ‘ Douglas ‘ exquisite
poetry, — otherwise, — it is a chance!

But with respect to your Brother . . first of all — nay,
and last of all, for it all is attributable to that — I feel his
kindness, in its way, as I feel yours ; as truly, according to
its degree and claim : but — ‘ now think what I would
speak ! ‘ — When he really does see me one day — no longer
embarrassed as under the circumstances I could not but
have been on these two or three occasions when we met — he
will find something better than conversational powers to
which I never pretended — and what he will accept in preference,
— a true, faithful desire of repaying his goodness —
he will find it, that is, because it must be there, and I have
confidence in such feelings making sooner or later their
way.

So now, at 2½ p.m., I must ( — here is the Post . . from you ?
Yes — the letter is here at last — I was waiting : — now to read;
no, kissing it comes first).

And now .. I will not say a word, my love of loves, my
dearest, dearest Ba, — not one word — but I will go out and
walk where I can be alone, and think out all my thought of
you, and bless you and love you with nothing to intercept
the blessing and the love. I will look in the direction of
London and send my heart there . . Dear, dear love, I kiss
you and commend you to God. Your very own —

I am very well — quite well, dearest.

#339

[Postmark: May 2, 1846]

How you write to me ! Is there any word to answer to
these words . . which, when I have read, I shut my eyes as
one bewildered, and think blindly . . or do not think — some
feelings are deeper than the thoughts touch. My only
beloved, it is thus with me . . . I stand by a miracle in
your love, and because I stand in it and it covers me,
just for that, you cannot see me ! May God grant that you .
never see me — for then we two shall be ‘ happy ‘ as you say,
and I, in the only possible manner, be very sure. Mean-
while, you do quite well not to speculate about making me
happy . . your instinct knows, if you do not know, that it is
implied in your own happiness . . or rather (not to assume
a magnanimity) in my sense of your being happy, not apart
from me. As God sees me, and as I know at all the motions
of my own soul, I may assert to you that from the first moment
of our being to each other anything, I never conceived
of happiness otherwise . . never thought of being happy
through you or by you or in you, even — your good was all
my idea of good, and is, I hear women say sometimes of
men whom they love . . ‘ such a one will make me happy,
I am sure,’ or ‘ I shall be happy with him I think’ — or
again . . ‘ He is so good and affectionate that nobody need
be afraid for my happiness.’ Now, whether you like or dis-
like it, I will tell you that I never had such thoughts of you,
nor ever, for a moment, gave you that sort of praise. I do
not know why . . or perhaps I do . . but I could not so
think of you , . I have not time nor breath . . I could
as soon play on the guitar when it is thundering. So be
happy, my own dearest . . and if it should be worth a
thought that you cannot be alone, so, you may think that too.
You have so deep and intense a nature, that it were impossible
for you to love after the fashion of other men, weakly
and imperfectly, and your love, which comes out like your
genius, may glorify enough to make you happy, perhaps.
Which is my dream, my calculation rather, when I am happiest
now. May God bless you. Suppose I should ever
read in your eyes that you were not happy with me ? — can I
help, do you fancy, such thoughts ? Could you help being
not happy ? The very word ‘ unhappiness ‘ implies that you
cannot help it. Now forgive me my naughtiness, because I
love you, and never loved but you, . . and because I promise
not to go with Miss Bayley to Italy . . I promise. Ah —
If you could pretend to be afraid of that, indeed, I have a
right to be afraid, without pretence at all . . I who am a
woman and frightened of lightning. And see the absurdity.
If I did not go to Italy with you, the reason would be that
you did not choose — and if you did not choose, I should not
choose . . I would not see Italy without your eyes — could I,
do you think ? So if Miss Bayley takes me to Italy with a
volume of the Cyclic poets, it will be as a dead Ba clasped
up between the leaves of it. You talked of a ‘ Flora,’ you
remember, in the first letter I had from you.

How bad of William Howitt ! How right you are,
always ! Yet not quite always, dear dearest beloved, happily
for your own

Ba.

Say how you are I beseech you, and honestly ! I
was down-stairs to-day, since the wind changed, and am
the better for it. What writing for a postman ! — or for you
even !