#420

[Postmark: June 23, 1846]

Tuesday Morning

I was just on the point of answering your dear letter, in
all the good spirits it might be expected to wake in me,
when the sad news of poor Haydon’s death stopped all ;
much I feel it, for the light words of my own about his
extravagance, as I had been told of it, but very much more
on your account, who were so lately in communication with
him. I earnestly hope, – I will trust – you have not been
rudely apprised of this – I am happy to remember that you
do not see the newspaper in the morning, – others will see it
first ; perhaps there may be no notice in the Chronicle at all,
or on the other hand, a more circumstantial one than this
in the Times which barely says – ‘that B.R.H. died suddenly
at his residence – yesterday morning. He was in his usual
health on the previous evening, and it is believed that his
decease was hastened by pecuniary embarrassment’ – and
he is called ‘ the unfortunate gentleman ‘ – which with the
rest implies the very worst, I fear. If by any chance this
should be the first intimation you receive of it . . do not
think me stupid nor brutal, – for I thought again and again
as to the right course to take . . whether it would not be
best to be silent altogether and wait and see . . but in that
case I should have surprised you more by my cold letter, –
such an one as I could bring myself to write, – for how were
it possible to speak of pictures and indifferent matters when
you perhaps have been shocked, made ill by this news ? If
I have done wrong, forgive me, my own best, dearest Ba –
I would give the world to know how you are. The storm,
too, and lightning may have made you even more than
ordinarily unfit to be startled and grieved. God knows and
must help you ! I am but your devoted –

How glad I am you told me you had never seen him.
And perhaps he may be after all a mere acquaintance . .
anything I will fancy that is likely to relieve you of pain !
Dearest dearest !

#419

[Postmark: June 23, 1846]

Monday Evening.

Well – I did look everywhere for you to-day, – but not
more than I always do – always I do, when I go out, look
for you in the streets . . round the corners ! And Mrs.
Jameson came alone and she and I were alone at Mr.
Rogers’s, and you must help me to thank her some day for
her unspeakable kindness to me, though she did not leap to
the height of the inspiration of managing to let us see those
pictures together. Ah – if she had, it would have been too
much. As it is, she gave me a great deal of pleasure in
the kindest of ways . . and I let it be pleasure, by mixing
it with enough thoughts of you – (otherwise how could it
be pleasure ?) – and she showed the pictures, and instructed
me, really taking pains and instructing me . . and tellin g
me how Rubens painted landscapes . . as how should my
ignorance guess ? . . . and various other unknown things
The first word as we reached the door, frightened me – for
she said that perhaps we might see Mr. Rogers . . which
was a little beyond our covenant – but we did not see him,
and I suppose the Antinous on the staircase is not at all
like him. Grand it is, in its serene beauty. On a colossal
scale, in white marble. For the pictures, they are full
of wonder and divinity – each giving the measure of a
man’s soul. And think . . sketches from the hand of
Michael Angelo and Raphael ! And a statuette in clay,
alive with the life of Michael Angelo’s finger – the blind
eyes looking . . seeing . . as if in scorn of all clay !
And the union of energy and meditation in the whole
attitude ! You have seen the marble of that figure in
Florence. Then, a divine Virgin and child, worn and faded
to a shadow of Raphael’s genius, as Mrs. Jameson explained
to me and the famous ‘ Ecce Homo ‘ of Guido . . and
Rubens’ magnificent ‘ version ‘ as she called it, of Andrea
Mantegna’s ‘Triumph of Julius Caesar.’ So triumphing to
this day ! And Titian, and Tintoretto . . . and what did
not strike me the least, . . a portrait of Rembrandt by him-
self, which if his landscapes, as they say, were ‘ dug out of
nature,’ looks as if it were dug out of humanity. Such a
rugged, dark, deep subterraneous face, . . yet inspired !
seeming to realize that God took clay and breathed into the
nostrils of it. There are both the clay, and the divinity !
And think ! I saw the agreement between the bookseller
and Milton for the sale of Paradise Lost ! with Milton’s
signature and seal ! and ‘ Witnessed by William Greene,
Mr. Milton’s servant.’ How was it possible not to feel
giddy with such sights ! Almost I could have run my head
against the wall, I felt, with bewilderment – and Mrs.
Jameson must have been edified, I have thought since,
through my intense stupidity. I saw too the first edition of
‘ Paradise Lost.’ The rooms are elegant, with no pretension
to splendour . . which is good taste, a part of the good
taste everywhere. Only, on the chimney-piece of the
dining-room, were two small busts, beautiful busts, white
with marble, . . and representing – now, whom, of gods
and men, would you select for your Lares . . to help your
digestion and social merriment ? . . . Caligula and Nero
in childhood! The ‘childhood’ is horribly suggestive to me!
On the side-board is Pope’s bust, by Roubillac – a too ex
pressive, miserable face – drawn with disease and bitter
thoughts, and very painful, I felt, to look at. These things
I liked least, in the selection and arrangement. Every-
thing beside was admirable : and I write and write of it all
as if I were not tired – but I am . . and most with the
excitement and newness. Mrs. Jameson breakfasted with
Mr. Rogers yesterday, she said, and met the Countess
Hahn-Hahn, who was talking of modern literature when
her host suddenly stopped her with a question . . ‘ Did you
ever read Addison ? ‘

How late it is. Must I have done, before I have half
done?

What I did not tell you yesterday is very much in my
thoughts . . do you know ? /, too, ‘ see what I know and
testify what I have felt . . and, as far as my faculties of
perception go ! ‘ I am confident that you had better not
look for a single reason for loving me. Which is worst ?
A bad reason, or no reason at all ? A bad reason, I think
– and accept the alternative. Ah . . my own only beloved.
And how you write to me to-night ! I will read what you
tell me in Landor . . but no words of inspired lips or
pen . . no poet’s word, of the divinest, . . ever went to
my heart as yours in these letters ! Do I not love you ?
am I not your own ? And while deserving nothing of all of
it, I feel it at least – respond to it – my heart is in your
hand. May God bless you . . ‘ and me in that ,’ – because
even He could not bless me without that. Which He
knows.

Your own.

But there is much beauty in Faustina oh, surely !
The lilies, all in blow except one . . which is blowing.
Are we going to have a storm to-night ? It lightens . .
lightens !