[Postmark: May 26, 1846]
Monday Morning.
My beloved I scarcely know what to say about the poem.
It is almost profane and a sin to keep you from writing it
when your mind goes that way, — yet I am afraid that you
cannot begin without doing too much and without suffering
as a consequence in your head. Now if you make yourself
ill, what will be the end ? So you see my fears ! Let it be
however as it must be ! Only you will promise to keep from
all excesses, and to write very very gently. Ah — can you
keep such a promise, if it is made ever so ? There are the
fears again.
You are very strange in what you say about my reading
your poetry — as if it were not my peculiar gladness and
glory ! — my own, which no man can take from me. And
not you indeed ! Yet I am not likely to mistake your poetry
for the flower of your nature, knowing what that flower is,
knowing something of what that flower is without a name,
and feeling something of the mystical perfume of it. When
I said, or when others said for me, that my poetry was the
flower of me, was it praise, did you think, or blame ? might
it not stand for a sarcasm ? It might, — if it were not true,
miserably true after a fashion.
Yet something of the sort is true, of course, with all poets
who write directly from their personal experience and emotions
— their ideal rises to the surface and floats like the bell
of the waterlily. The roots and the muddy water are subaudita
you know — as surely there, as the flower.
But you . . you have the superabundant mental life and
individuality which admits of shifting a personality and
speaking the truth still. That is the highest faculty, the
strongest and rarest, which exercises itself in Art, — we are
all agreed there is none so great faculty as the dramatic.
Several times you have hinted to me that I made you
careless for the drama, and it has puzzled me to fancy how
it could be, when I understand myself so clearly both the
difficulty and the glory of dramatic art. Yet I am conscious
of wishing you to take the other crown besides — and after
having made your own creatures speak in clear human voices,
to speak yourself out of that personality which God made,
and with the voice which He tuned into such power and
sweetness of speech. I do not think that, with all that
music in you, only your own personality should be dumb,
nor that having thought so much and deeply on life and its
ends, you should not teach what you have learnt, in the
directest and most impressive way, the mask thrown off
however moist with the breath. And it is not, I believe, by
the dramatic medium, that poets teach most impressively —
I have seemed to observe that ! . . it is too difficult for the
common reader to analyse, and to discern between the vivid
and the earnest. Also he is apt to understand better always,
when he sees the lips move. Now, here is yourself, with
your wonderful faculty! — it is wondered at and recognised
on all sides where there are eyes to see — it is called wonderful
and admirable ! Yet, with an inferior power, you might
have taken yourself closer to the hearts and lives of men,
and made yourself dearer, though being less great. Therefore
I do want you to do this with your surpassing power —
it will be so easy to you to speak, and so noble, when
spoken.
Not that I usen’t to fancy I could see you and know you,
in a reflex image, in your creations ! I used, you remember.
How these broken lights and forms look strange and unlike
now to me, when I stand by the complete idea. Yes, now
I feel that no one can know you worthily by those poems.
Only . . I guessed a little. Now let us have your own voice
speaking of yourself — if the voice may not hurt the speaker
— which is my fear.
Evening. — Thank you, dearest dearest ! I have your
parcel — I have your letters . . . three letters to-day, it is
certainly feast day with me. Thank you my own dearest
The drawings I had just fixed in my mind, courageously to
ask for, because as you meant me to keep them I did not
see why I should throw away a fortune — and they return to
me with interest . . I observe these new vivid sketches !
Some day I shall put them into a book, as you should have
done. Then for the Roman ode, and all the rest, thank
you, thank you. I looked here and looked there, though,
for a letter — I could not find it at first, and was just saying
to myself quite articulately ‘ What wickedness ‘ ! . . . meaning
that it was wickedness in you to send me a parcel without
a word, . . when I came upon the folded paper. For I looked
inside the books, be sure. I did not toss them away . . .
There’s the gratitude of the world, you see ! and of
womankind in particular ! there’s the malign spirit of the
genus coffee-cup-throw-arum! Talking of which coffee-cups,
you dare me to it. Which is imprudent, to say the least of
it. I heard once of her most gracious Majesty’s throwing a
tea-cup, — whereupon Albertus Magnus, who is no conjurer,
could find nothing better to do than to walk out of the room
in solemn silence. If I had been he, I should have tied
the royal hands. I think ; for when women get to be warlike
after that demonstrative fashion, it seems to me to be allowable
to teach them that they are not the strongest. I say it,
never thinking of my ‘ licence to ‘ throw coffee-cups — which
you granted, knowing very well what I know intimately, . .
that . . that . .
I have a theory about you. Was ever anybody in the
world, . . a woman at least, . . angry with you? If anyone
ever tried, did she not fail in the first breath of the trying ? —
go out to curse like the prophet, and bless instead ? Tell
me if anyone was ever angry with you ? It is impossible, I
know perfectly. Therefore, as to the coffee-cup license, . .
the divine Achilles, invulnerable all but the heel, might as
well have said to his dearest foe ‘ Draw out your sword, O
Diomede, and strike me across the head, prick me in the
forehead, slash me over the ears, . .’ and that stand for a
proof of courage !
What stuff I do write, to be sure. I was out to-day walking,
with Arabel and Flush, and rested at the bookseller’s ;
but as I went farther than the other day, I let Stormie carry
me up-stairs, . . it is such a long way ! Say how you are,
dearest — you do not ! Shall you walk so fast when you
walk with me under the trees ? I shall not let you — I shall
hang back, as Flush does, when he won’t go with a string.
Ah — little (altogether) you know perhaps what a hard
Degree that B : A : is, to take the BA which is not a
Bachelor’s.
No, no, for the rest. It was not any Brown on earth,
but the only Browning of the great genius, who was shown
up as intimate friend to the Miss Cokers and elect husband
of that cloud, Miss Campbell the ‘ great heiress ‘ — all
in proportion, observe ! But I do entreat you not to say a
word to Dr. White or another. Why should you ? It is
mere nonsense, — so do let it evaporate quietly. Why, with
all my doubts for which you have blamed me, . . at the
thickest and saddest of the doubting, it never was what
people could say of you that could move me. And this is
so foolish, and unbelieved even by the very persons who say
it, perhaps ! Let it pass away with other dust, in the wind.
It is not worth the watering.
May God bless you ! This is my last letter . . already !
I had another criticism to-day from America, in a book called
‘ Thoughts on the Poets,’ which is written by a Mr. Tuckermann,
and selects its poets on the most singular principle . . or
rather on none at all . . beginning with Petrarch, ending with
Bryant, receiving Tennyson, Procter, Hunt, and your Ba . .
and not a word of you ! Stupid book — Petrarch and Alfieri
are the only foreign poets admitted — criticisms, swept back
to the desk from the magazines, I dare say. Very kind to
me — you shall see if you like.
And now . . good-night at last ! it must come. Have I
not written you one letter as long as the three ? Only not
worth a third as much — that I know.
Wholly and ever your
Ba.
Oh I must speak, though I meant to be silent ! though
first, I meant to keep the great subject of the Statesmen for
an explosion on Wednesday. I gave up the early poems
because I felt contented to read them afterwards — but listen
. . my Statesmen , I will not give up. Now listen — I expect
nothing at all from them — they were written for another
person, and under peculiar circumstances . . they are probably
as bad as anything written by you, can be. Will that
do, to say ? And may I see them ? Now I ask ever so
humbly . . Dearest !